Search results for "measurement errors"
showing 3 items of 3 documents
Sexing birds using discriminant function analysis: a critical appraisal.
2011
9 pages; International audience; Discriminant function analysis (DFA) based on morphological measurements is a quick, inexpensive, and efficient method for sex determination in field studies on cryptically monomorphic bird species. However, behind the apparent standardization and relative simplicity of DFA lie subtle differences and pitfalls that have been neglected in some studies. Most of these concerns directly affect assessment of the discriminant performance, a parameter of crucial importance in practice because it provides a measure of the quality of an equation that may be used in later field studies. Using results from 141 published studies and simulations based on a large data set …
Sensitivity of the SIMulation-EXtrapolation (SIMEX) methodology to mis-specification of the statistical properties of the measurement errors
2023
In hydrometeorological and environmental studies, it is common to seek relations between two variables (predictand and predictor), one of which (predictor) is affected by uncertainties. These errors unavoidably affect the results of the analyses by providing erroneous estimates of the parameters of the predictor-predictand model. A possible solution is represented by the SIMulation-EXtrapolation (SIMEX) methodology. This approach follows two steps: (1) perturbation of the predictor with increasing levels of uncertainties (multiples of the known error variance); and (2) finding a relation between the model's parameters and level of uncertainty, which allows their extrapolation to the error-f…
Development of an individualized familiarization method for vertical jumps
2013
OBJETIVO: Propor um método de familiarização individualizado para saltos verticais e verificar o seu efeito na variabilidade intrassujeito. MÉTODOS: Cinquenta e três homes (média ± DP; idade 23,5 ± 3,3 anos; estatura 1,76 ± 0,08 m; massa 72,8 ± 8,6 kg; percentual de gordura 12,9 ± 5,2%) realizaram sucessivos saltos até atingir o nível de estabilidade proposto. Após 48 h este processo era repetido e a estabilidade entre dias era verificada, se necessário, mais sessões eram realizadas. O nível de estabilidade foi determinado por um teste z, com intervalo de confiança de 95%. Após o processo de familiarização, duas sessões experimentais adicionais foram realizadas para determinar a confiabilid…